Caririchnium lotus
No picture of Caririchnium lotus was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none. Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Caririchnium lotus, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
On record
Recorded, not inferred- Sits inside
- CaririchniumPBDB
- Diet
- herbivorePBDB, for Ornithopoda
- Life habit
- ground dwelling, gregariousPBDB, for Ornithischia
- Motility
- actively mobilePBDB, for Ornithischia
- Environment
- terrestrialPBDB, for Ornithischia
Time the record covers
At least 15 million years on record.
The record covers at least 137.05 Mya to 121.4 Mya. No occurrence read is dated outside 143.1 Mya to 100.5 Mya.
9 occurrences of Caririchnium lotus on record, most of them in the Early Cretaceous. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.
When
9 occurrences- Early Cretaceous100%
These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.
Found in
3 formations
- Jiaguan Formation · Chiating Group3
- Huérteles Formation · Oncala Group1
- Sanbukdong Formation1
Loading coastlines…
The named rock units Caririchnium lotus has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed. 4 occurrences have no formation on record, which is common for older literature.
Caririchnium lotus and its relatives
Early CretaceousWhere Caririchnium lotus and its relatives were recorded in the Early Cretaceous.
Found in the same rock
13 taxa- Theropoda5 sites
- Ornithopoda2 sites
- Sauropoda2 sites
- Beaconites1 site
- Brontopodus1 site
- Cerithium1 site
- Crocodylopodus meijidei n. gen. n. sp.1 site
- Dinosauria1 site
- Iguanodontipodidae1 site
- Megalosaurus1 site
- Planolites beverleyensis1 site
- Pterosauria1 site
- Scoyenia gracilis1 site
The Paleobiology Database records 9 sites for Caririchnium lotus, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too.
This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.
Entered from
5 references- Generalidades sobre las icnitas ornitópodas de La Rioja (Cuenca de Cameros, España) [General information about ornithopod footprints from La Rioja (Cameros Basin, Spain)]3
- Ichnotaxonomic review of large ornithopod dinosaur tracks: temporal and geographic implications2
- An ornithopod-dominated tracksite from the Lower Cretaceous Jiaguan Formation (Barremian-Albian) of Qijiang, south-central China: new discoveries, ichnotaxonomy, preservation and palaeoecology2
- A new dinosaur tracksite from the Lower Cretaceous Sanbukdong Formation of Gunsan City, South Korea1
- [The discovery of dinosaur footprints from the middle Cretaceous Jiaguan Formation of Qijiang County, Chongqing City]1
Each of the 9 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.
Media and terms
Media content0
No picture of Caririchnium lotus was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none.
Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.
GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Caririchnium lotus, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
No 3D scan of Caririchnium lotus was found in Sketchfab.
Smithsonian Open Access and MorphoSource were not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.
This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.
Keep going
What may have been alongside itCaririchnium through timeFormations of the Early CretaceousThe world it lived on
Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Xing et al. 2007