Biplica heteroplicata

Biplica heteroplicata

via iDigBio · CC BY · via iDigBio. May be a photograph of a specimen, or an artist’s reconstruction — an interpretation of a skeleton, since colour and soft tissue are almost never preserved.

On record

Recorded, not inferred
Sits inside
BiplicaPBDB
Diet
carnivorePBDB, for Ringiculidae
Life habit
epifaunalPBDB, for Ringiculidae
Motility
actively mobilePBDB, for Ringiculidae
Vision
limitedPBDB, for Gastropoda

Time the record covers

At most 6.2 million years on record.

Every occurrence read is dated to somewhere between 89.8 Mya and 83.6 Mya, and nothing in the dating separates them, so that window is what the record shows rather than a span.

Late Cretaceous — about 8 of 8 occurrencesLate Cretaceous90–90 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences90–89 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences89–89 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences89–89 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences89–89 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences89–88 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences88–88 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences88–88 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences88–88 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences88–87 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences87–87 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences87–87 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences87–87 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences87–86 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences86–86 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences86–86 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences86–86 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences86–86 Mya — about 0.6 occurrences86–85 Mya — about 0.7 occurrences85–85 Mya — about 0.7 occurrences85–85 Mya — about 0.7 occurrences85–85 Mya — about 0.7 occurrences85–84 Mya — about 0.7 occurrences84–84 Mya — about 0.7 occurrences84–84 Mya — about 0.7 occurrences84–84 Mya — about 0.6 occurrences90.3 Mya83.1 Mya

8 occurrences of Biplica heteroplicata on record, most of them in the Late Cretaceous. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.

When

8 occurrences

These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.

Found in

2 formations

Redding — 40.54°N, 122.15°WRedding — 40.59°N, 122.10°WRedding — 40.65°N, 122.11°WRedding — 40.68°N, 122.02°WChico — 39.87°N, 121.71°W

Loading coastlines…

The named rock units Biplica heteroplicata has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed.

Biplica heteroplicata and its relatives

Late Cretaceous

Where Biplica heteroplicata and its relatives were recorded in the Late Cretaceous.

Found in the same rock

34 taxa

The Paleobiology Database records 8 sites for Biplica heteroplicata, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.

This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.

Entered from

1 reference

Each of the 8 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Each entry links to the Paleobiology Database's own record for the work.

Media and terms

Media content1

Picture of Biplica heteroplicata

Source
iDigBio
Credit
via iDigBio
Licence
CC BY
Commercial use
the licence allows it

No 3D scan of Biplica heteroplicata was found in Sketchfab.

Smithsonian Open Access and MorphoSource were not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.

This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.

Keep going

What may have been alongside itBiplica through timeFormations of the Late CretaceousThe world it lived on

Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Popenoe 1957