Baculatriletes sp.
No picture of Baculatriletes sp. was found. Wikipedia and Wikidata were searched and had none. iDigBio and GBIF were not searched: the Paleobiology Database does not place Baculatriletes sp. firmly enough to tell it from something else bearing the same name, and a search on the name alone returns whichever of them was photographed. Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.
Time the record covers
At least 75 million years on record.
The record covers at least 113.2 Mya to 37.71 Mya. No occurrence read is dated outside 121.4 Mya to 27.3 Mya.
6 occurrences of Baculatriletes sp. on record, most of them in the Early Cretaceous. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.
When
6 occurrences- Early Cretaceous67%
- Eocene23%
- Oligocene11%
These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.
Found in
3 formations
Loading coastlines…
The named rock units Baculatriletes sp. has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed. 1 occurrence has no formation on record, which is common for older literature.
Baculatriletes sp. and its relatives
Early CretaceousWhere Baculatriletes sp. and its relatives were recorded in the Early Cretaceous.
Found in the same rock
118 taxa- Psilatriletes5 sites
- Classopollis intrareticulatus4 sites
- Echimonoletes4 sites
- Echitriletes4 sites
- Inaperturapollenites (<scabratus>)4 sites
- Laevigatosporites ovatus4 sites
- Leptolepidites4 sites
- Verrutriletes4 sites
- Afropollis jardinus3 sites
- Angiosperm sp.3 sites
- Asteropollis3 sites
- Concavissimisporites3 sites
- Equisetosporites3 sites
- Pennipollis reticulatus3 sites
- Spore spp.3 sites
- Verrucosisporites rotundus3 sites
- Appendicidisporites jansonii2 sites
- Araucariacidites guianensis2 sites
- Araucariacites australis2 sites
- Baculatisporites comaumensis2 sites
- Brenneripollis2 sites
- Callialasporites dampieri2 sites
- Callialasporites trilobatus2 sites
- Cicatricosisporites2 sites
The Paleobiology Database records 5 sites for Baculatriletes sp., and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.
This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.
Entered from
3 references- Palynological composition of a Lower Cretaceous South American tropical sequence: Climatic implications and diversity comparisons with other latitudes4
- Biotic community and landscape changes around the Eocene–Oligocene transition at Shapaja, Peruvian Amazonia: Regional or global drivers?1
- Middle Eocene rodents from Peruvian Amazonia reveal the pattern and timing of caviomorph origins and biogeography1
Each of the 6 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Each entry links to doi.org. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.
Media and terms
Media content0
No picture of Baculatriletes sp. was found. Wikipedia and Wikidata were searched and had none.
iDigBio and GBIF were not searched: the Paleobiology Database does not place Baculatriletes sp. firmly enough to tell it from something else bearing the same name, and a search on the name alone returns whichever of them was photographed.
Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.
No 3D scan of Baculatriletes sp. was found in MorphoSource and Sketchfab.
Smithsonian Open Access was not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.
This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.
Keep going
What may have been alongside itFormations of the Early CretaceousThe world it lived on
Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0.