Arcellites santacrucensis

No picture of Arcellites santacrucensis was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none. Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Arcellites santacrucensis, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

On record

Recorded, not inferred
Sits inside
ArcellitesPBDB
Diet
"photoautotroph"PBDB, for Streptophyta

Time the record covers

At least 26 million years on record.

The record covers at least 110.1 Mya to 83.6 Mya. No occurrence read is dated outside 119.57 Mya to 66 Mya.

Early Cretaceous — about 8 of 9 occurrencesEarly CretaceousLate Cretaceous — about 1 of 9 occurrencesLate CretaceousPaleocene — about 0 of 9 occurrences121–119 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences119–117 Mya — about 1.0 occurrences117–115 Mya — about 1.0 occurrences115–113 Mya — about 1.0 occurrences113–111 Mya — about 1 occurrence111–109 Mya — about 0.8 occurrences109–108 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences108–106 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences106–104 Mya — about 0.7 occurrences104–102 Mya — about 0.7 occurrences102–100 Mya — about 0.6 occurrences100–98 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences98–96 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences96–95 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences95–93 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences85–84 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences84–82 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences82–80 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences80–78 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences78–76 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences76–74 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences74–72 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences72–71 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences71–69 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences69–67 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences67–65 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences110.1 Mya83.6 Mya121 Mya65 Mya

9 occurrences of Arcellites santacrucensis on record, most of them in the Early Cretaceous. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.

When

9 occurrences

These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.

Found in

3 formations

Kachaike — 49.15°S, 72.07°WKachaike — 48.85°S, 72.03°WKachaike — 49.17°S, 72.00°WArcillas Fragmentosus — 50.00°S, 69.58°WPiedra Clavada — 48.75°S, 71.40°W

Loading coastlines…

The named rock units Arcellites santacrucensis has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed.

Arcellites santacrucensis and its relatives

Early Cretaceous

Where Arcellites santacrucensis and its relatives were recorded in the Early Cretaceous.

Found in the same rock

3 taxa

The Paleobiology Database records 2 sites for Arcellites santacrucensis, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too.

This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.

Entered from

3 references

Each of the 9 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.

Media and terms

Media content0

No picture of Arcellites santacrucensis was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none.

Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Arcellites santacrucensis, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

No 3D scan of Arcellites santacrucensis was found in Sketchfab.

Smithsonian Open Access and MorphoSource were not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.

This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.

Keep going

Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Baldoni 1987