Ambonychiopsis osmundsbergensis

No picture of Ambonychiopsis osmundsbergensis was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none. Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Ambonychiopsis osmundsbergensis, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

On record

Recorded, not inferred
Sits inside
AmbonychiopsisPBDB
Diet
suspension feederPBDB, for Ambonychiidae
Life habit
epifaunalPBDB, for Ambonychiidae
Motility
stationary, attachedPBDB, for Ambonychiidae
Vision
blindPBDB, for Bivalvia

Time the record covers

At most 9.7 million years on record.

The one occurrence read is dated to somewhere between 452.8 Mya and 443.1 Mya, which is a dating window rather than a span.

Ordovician — about 1 of 1 occurrenceOrdovicianSilurian — about 0 of 1 occurrence453–453 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences453–452 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences452–452 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences452–452 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences452–451 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences451–451 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences451–450 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences450–450 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences450–450 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences450–449 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences449–449 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences449–449 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences449–448 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences448–448 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences448–448 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences448–447 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences447–447 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences447–447 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences447–446 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences446–446 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences446–445 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences445–445 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences445–445 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences445–444 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences444–444 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences444–444 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences444–443 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences443–443 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences453.3 Mya442.6 Mya

1 occurrence of Ambonychiopsis osmundsbergensis on record, most of them in the Ordovician. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.

When

1 occurrences

These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.

Found in

1 formation

Boda Limestone — 61.05°N, 15.20°E

Loading coastlines…

The named rock units Ambonychiopsis osmundsbergensis has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed.

Ambonychiopsis osmundsbergensis and its relatives

Ordovician

Where Ambonychiopsis osmundsbergensis and its relatives were recorded in the Ordovician.

Found in the same rock

99 taxa

The Paleobiology Database records 1 site for Ambonychiopsis osmundsbergensis, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.

This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.

Entered from

1 reference

Each of the 1 occurrence read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Each entry links to the Paleobiology Database's own record for the work.

Media and terms

Media content0

No picture of Ambonychiopsis osmundsbergensis was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none.

Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Ambonychiopsis osmundsbergensis, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

No 3D scan of Ambonychiopsis osmundsbergensis was found in MorphoSource and Sketchfab.

Smithsonian Open Access was not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.

This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.

Keep going

Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Isberg 1934